High School Article Causes Uproar in Local Community

by: THRILL

Vista, CA- High school student Hannah Brenzel wrote an article that is upsetting several conservatives in her local community. In the January 2010 print of her school newspaper, The Eagle Flyer, her article titled, "Presidential Critique: Argument just for argument's sake?" contains several statements that reek foul.

It is obvious from her article that Brenzel sides with the Obama Administration. That is fine. What is bothersome is the misjudgement of those who do not side, or support, our President. This article is one of many that gets printed on a day by day bases, written by a liberal mindset, which inevitably deteriorates our fabric of the American society.

Brenzel begins her article explaining how negative it is for a child to accept the political views of their parents. Her incorporation of Socrates, though very wise, is used to support the modern day, morally declined secular view- which is our youth disobeying most of our rules as leading parents. But when it comes to politics, Brenzel encourages YOU to lean on YOUR OWN understanding.

It's every parents' duty to train up a child in the way they should go. Why am I wrong of a parent if I train my child to become a Christian Conservative? Shouldn't a child be able to trust the decisions of their own parent? Hannah Brenzel doesn't think so. Infact, she goes on to point out that some students chose to make statements that are inaccurate about our president- the students that don't agree with Obama.

But what about her and those like her? Is it not true they are doing the same? I see it all the time. People praise Obama's "political platform" all the time based on what... Because everyone else is doing it? I see more people praising Obama based on NO FACTS than I do people bashing Obama based on NO FACTS as well.

Yet it's the same old song and dance. I find it EVIDENT that so many liberals praise Obama because of... hmmm.... why do liberals praise Obama? Yet there is so much good reason for a realist, or truth seeker, to conclude that Obama is bad for this country. Brenzel's article makes it clear that I'm not respecting Obama because I disagree with him. This is ludicrous. I'm not throwing tomatoes at him.

If I have solid reason, and I do, to form my own political view on Obama, just as Brenzel encourages me to do in her article, which is that I do not agree with his agenda as president, how am I being disrespectful? It is obvious: Hannah Brenzel is like the majority of Obama supporters. She's closed-minded towards truth, and open-minded towards liberalism.

Her calvanistic approach at Romans chapter thirteen blinds our Christian youth into believing that God ordained this president into office. I can't buy that. I wont teach that to my youth. There is a key agent that she's leaving out. Most Calvanists also forget...

the element of our own free will. Our free will allows us to make choices and desicions. There are consequences to the wrong decisions we make. Obama is a result of a majority making a wrong decision. God didn't put Obama in office. We the people did. (We the people who voted for him, not we the people of the entire United States)

Another American offended by Brenzel's article, is Mario De Maria. Now you all know of Mario De Maria because I've brought him up before in past blogs and articles of my own. What's amazing about Mario is that he's a dying breed. Though only in his 20s, he grasps the threat we as God fearing Americans are facing. The plague of liberalism: a true mental disorder.

Mario De Maria understands that the enemy to our American way of life is biased news articles like the one Brenzel posted in The Eagle Flyer.

"But so what!" You might add,"Hannah Brenzel is harming nobody with her article! Why should we care or not about what our high schoolers post in their school paper?"

Because our youth is leaning on to their own understanding, not towards righteousness and truth. Brenzel's article is definite proof of this. Mario De Maria recognizes the severity of this situation. As an American patriot, who is not stubborn with his old age, and can lead our next generation of children, Mario De Maria made it very clear that Hannah Brenzel's article is an abortion.

I look foward to hearing and reading what Mario De Maria has to say in response to "Presidential Critique: Argument just for argument's sake?"

Well, Mario, what say you?